What’s most effective at Cost Containment with kubernetes cloud deployments

During the opening gambit of the cloud market a lot of providers are vying for dominance in an open market.  Hybrid cloud technology helps us to build best of breed services. Many cloud service providers have enabled a different type of service mesh which we call “scale to zero”. Engineers at Google released many technologies into the open source Community providing a great number of assets for Cloud deployment. However amidst the big 5, the open source may actually en passant, or something incidentally created while doing something else. 

What does this really change?

Scale-to-zero, which is something we’ve all asked for, allows a very light microservice to drop to hardly any services at all. The machine can then be expected to scale up appropriately through creating pods very quickly. And allocating resources in “load balancers” and other instances in the cloud create true elasticity.

Through the looking glass

Lewis Carroll, who became very well known for his Alice in Wonderland book series, is actually a pseudonym of professor Charles Lutwidge Dodgson. He wrote an interesting paper during is time at Cambridge. It was a math proof, or a logic puzzle. He surmised that in badmitton tournaments, the actual second place is undetermined. We have a winner-take-all when we only know who the Victor is; we don’t know who the runners the order of the runners-up.  What is obvious is the Amazon lead in the Cloud selections.

What is Google doing to change this industry

Knative is likely the tool With the greatest potential impact to come out of these open source tools. Knative centrally helps with this scale to zero requirement handling the service Mesh; an especially important part to any Cloud hybrid model. 

More about K8S

Anthos has been an entirely open-source platform which has created a good amount of Buzz for other vendors. Anthos has components such as the istio networking layer the virtual Cloud Network layer. K native being Incorporated into other server platforms and clouds such as Amazon and Azure. While the greatest considerations for any Cloud deployment is the continuing cost through asset allocation. However, it’s simple to build a huge amount of services through BMS; do you need for kubernetes to control resources just for costs outweigh any benefits to smaller deployments? It’s likely kubernetes is an essential piece of any modern business infrastructure.

Why should everybody emphasize kubernetes in their deployment if the costs are high

Any business can have an explosive amount of demand for their website. This includes low-profile web dependencies for a variety of scenarios. Even a landscaping company should have a plan for explosive global traffic. Business disaster plans should include scenarios that could bring a site down to its knees. While preparing for this possibility seems like a lost cause to a number of business operators, everything from selling a t-shirt to the name recognition suddenly become immensely valuable.  There is value created for the domain name. Partners may be wanting to enter or exit the business. Gaining investor attention is critical during a peak marketing success. 

 furthermore successful marketing efforts demand performance in a number of different zones. While a Content Distribution Network May help exceed expected demand. Dynamically allocated resources can suddenly become swamped by the back-end traffic.

But what if I already have a whole lot of VM’s everywhere

You know that virtual machines can get heavy.  One of the simplest things to do on any Cloud hosting service provider is to create excessive VMs. These are actually resource-intensive deployments where you have an operating system built on top of every actual service. I want to point out something here, this will inevitably create an intricate mess of tech debt.  This is what’s really heavy.  What kubernetes does best is to completely abstract the hardware and software layers separately. 

But we can see that clouds are cost dependent

Why only about 17% of companies are full cloud, the growth in this area is certain. You can go to any cloud machine and basically see the rapidly increasing state of adoption.  Each tech era like with IBM, SAP and now we’ve seen with Amazon Web Services eventually runs its course. We end up in the same place where a high number of services occupy a distributed sort of arrangement. A new type of service mesh that completely connects the command line to the cloud multi-vendor cloud is a real permanent solution. DevOps must always be adopting new modern Technologies today. 

What is in store for us?

And well, this is a little bit subtle, but folks like to hear the details, right? To see what’s going on.  Whats going on here is that there’s a thing called hop cost.  That’s the thing that truely owns the box of your containers.  Every hop that your microservices have to take through the internet results in delays. There is a performance need and a layer for packets and images flow to provide a high level of service to your clients. With a hybrid model it becomes possible to pick data centers regardless of platform in a region; so find one that’s closer to your actual customers and employees. End-users real-world experience working for your business are high priority. With website trends suggest that all assets should be loaded in under 4 seconds. This is on top of a fully customized ecosystem.

Cost Performance

While typically used to describe the gaming industry’s use of add-on products that get purchased after the original purchase, micropurchases are common. Any dive into the cloud ecosystem results and another list of endless database tables of microservices that come with their own independent cost tables. Other necessary assets such as load balancing end up on a different billing line for cloud providers. You may have to balance some of your container cost between different Cloud providers. Being able to choose different Cloud providers in a truly hybrid model allows you to balance budgets to create even an exceptional level of quality for the lowest possible variable cost. So you get with this an ability to lay out an entire year’s budget based on fixed cost.

so 0 scale does really matter

Another one of the benefits of having a truly hybrid cloud model is that with a new mechanism for building cloud services it’s possible to eliminate almost all other variable costs. Some you would typically associate with any sort of data operations for your customers and employees. So your fixed costs such as servers and a data center lease space (or a place to park computers) matters less.  

What does this bright future have for us

Many people have made advances to create a truly hybrid cloud model over decades. Yet the slow adoption of cloud for legacy-based companies calls for hybrid models with on-site on premises systems. Kubernetes offers a higher level of certificate management that becomes an essential oil once you integrate a high amount of SSL traffic. The entire world of api’s leverages a large amount of HTTP traffic. and with that there comes a need to secure a lot of these surfaces where you are still utilizing the same types of security keys to Grant these access rights.We’re going to see a hybrid model expand greatly over the coming years.

Contact us for your ideas

Share our content